Ogden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “general rule as to newly discovered evidence may be stated thus: That if, with the newly discovered evidence before them, the jury should not have come to the same conclusion, a new trial will be granted”
• “‘general rule as to newly discovered evidence may be stated thus: That if, with the newly discovered evidence before them, the jury should not have come to the same conclusion, a new trial will be granted’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Buckman
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2004-03-05· cited 274×
• State v. Carr
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2016-07-15· cited 69×
• State v. Wycoff
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1966-11-04· cited 17×
• Hans v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1946-03-29· cited 12×
• State v. Evans
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1971-11-24· cited 10×
• Mathews v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1924-02-13· cited 8×
• Kenyon v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1923-11-16· cited 6×
• Young v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1937-12-15· cited 6×
• Baskins v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1941-06-27· cited 6×
• Morrill County v. Bliss
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1933-11-24· cited 4×
• Zorn v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1932-07-19· cited 1×
• State v. Duncan
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2021-06-11

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Flanagan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1844-07-15· cited 61×
• Rainey v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1876-11-15· cited 8×