M.D. Pennsylvania· 10/10/2002

Ogden v. Keystone Residence

Citations

226 F. Supp. 2d 588
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19374
2002 WL 31299598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the standards of proof for PHRA claim are “identical to the standards of proof for a Title VII case”
noting that motions for reconsideration may not “reargue matters already argued and disposed of”
denying a motion for reconsideration where the plaintiff repeated arguments already rejected by the court
denying a motion for reconsideration where the plaintiff repeated arguments already rejected by the court
denying a motion for reconsideration where the plaintiff repeated arguments already rejected by the court
denying a motion for reconsideration where the plaintiff repeated arguments already rejected by the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCLURE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.