Ogden v. Keystone Residence

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the standards of proof for PHRA claim are “identical to the standards of proof for a Title VII case”
• noting that motions for reconsideration may not “reargue matters already argued and disposed of”
• denying a motion for reconsideration where the plaintiff repeated arguments already rejected by the court
• denying a motion for reconsideration where the plaintiff repeated arguments already rejected by the court
• denying a motion for reconsideration where the plaintiff repeated arguments already rejected by the court
• denying a motion for reconsideration where the plaintiff repeated arguments already rejected by the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).