Skip to main content
· 1/29/2009

Ogborne v. Mercer Cemetery Corp.

Citations

  • 963 A.2d 828
  • 197 N.J. 448
  • 2009 N.J. LEXIS 12

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that issues of proximate causation and comparative negligence were \intertwined\ with issue of duty, thereby requiring retrial on all three issues
  • holding that issues of proximate causation and comparative negligence were “intertwined” with issue of duty, thereby requiring retrial on all three issues
  • explaining that to constitute \palpably unreasonable\ conduct, \it must be manifest and obvious that no prudent person would approve of [the entity's] course of action or inaction.\ (quoting Kolitch, 100 N.J. at 493)
  • discussing when the palpably unreasonable conduct standard, which is higher than the ordinary negligence standard, applies to a public employee
  • discussing when the palpably unreasonable conduct standard, which is higher than the ordinary negligence standard, applies to a public employee
  • applying the TCA A-4405-17T3 5 to claims brought against the City of Trenton

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.