Ogbolumani v. Napolitano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that challenger to administrative decision must show that evidence was inadequate to support the decision
• noting that “speculation” is not enough to call into question an USCIS investigator’s report
• affirming finding of fraud where plaintiff backtracked from prior incriminating statement but did not explicitly deny making it
• allowing use of hearsay summaries of witness interviews to prove marriage fraud where nothing suggested summaries were inaccurate or unreliable beyond inherent risks of summaries
• rejecting plaintiffs' attempt to \essentially recast[ ] their arguments under the [APA] as constitutional ones” because \arbitrary rulings do not necessarily infringe upon the right to due process”
• nit-picking the exact characterization of the evidence would overstep the court’s limited role

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).