O'Gara v. Neylon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an argument that the opinions of three orthopedic specialists should be given greater consideration than that of the family physician, and explaining that the matter involved the weight and probative force of the evidence rather than its sub-stantiality
• rejecting an argument that the opinions of three orthopedic specialists should be given greater consideration than that of the family physician, and explaining that the matter involved the weight and probative force of the evidence rather than its substantiality
• rejecting an argument that the opinions of three orthopedic specialists should be given greater consideration than that of the family physician and explaining that the matter involved the weight and probative force of the evidence rather than its substantiality
• rejecting an argument that the opinions of three orthopedic specialists should be given greater consideration than that of the family physician and explaining that the matter involved the weight and probative force of the evidence rather than its substantiality
• rejecting an argument that the opinions of three orthopedic specialists should be given greater consideration than that of the family physician and explaining that the matter involved the weight and probative force of the evidence rather than its substantiality
• claimant’s job skills, education, and fact that he suffered severe pain supported Commission’s finding of total permanent disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).