Offutt v. Trail

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellate court, although correct that the sentence imposed by the trial court was contrary to law, nevertheless erred in modifying the sentence rather than vacating it and remanding it for re-sentencing
• agreeing that trial judge’s failure to make the findings on the record required by R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) is “contrary to law.”
• agreeing that trial judge's failure to make the findings on the record required by R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) is \contrary to law.\
• stating that a conviction of the underlying sexually violent offense triggers the proceeding to determine if a defendant is guilty of the attached specification
• “when a trial court imposes consecutive sentences, it must state on the record its reasons for doing so”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).