Skip to main content
· 6/6/2005

Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 95 v. Wood County Telephone Company

Citations

  • 408 F.3d 314
  • 2005 WL 1163624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “desire to reopen” discussions about and “termination” of a collective bargaining agreement are distinct concepts
  • distinguishing “between dues checkoffs and other terms and conditions of employment,” but only with respect to the “express‐ contractual‐authorization requirement” for checkoffs
  • distinguishing “between dues checkoffs and other terms and conditions of employment,” but only with respect to the “express‐ contractual‐authorization requirement” for checkoffs
  • distinguishing “between dues checkoffs and other terms and conditions of employment,” but only with respect to the “express‐ contractual‐authorization requirement” for checkoffs
  • “The con- tract in American Maize added that a proposal to amend speci- fied terms would not produce termination; we thought it sig- nificant that the union’s notice referred to all terms rather than particular sections, a step that would have kept the remainder in force.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.