· 6/6/2005
Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 95 v. Wood County Telephone Company
Citations
- 408 F.3d 314
- 2005 WL 1163624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “desire to reopen” discussions about and “termination” of a collective bargaining agreement are distinct concepts
- distinguishing “between dues checkoffs and other terms and conditions of employment,” but only with respect to the “express‐ contractual‐authorization requirement” for checkoffs
- distinguishing “between dues checkoffs and other terms and conditions of employment,” but only with respect to the “express‐ contractual‐authorization requirement” for checkoffs
- distinguishing “between dues checkoffs and other terms and conditions of employment,” but only with respect to the “express‐ contractual‐authorization requirement” for checkoffs
- “The con- tract in American Maize added that a proposal to amend speci- fied terms would not produce termination; we thought it sig- nificant that the union’s notice referred to all terms rather than particular sections, a step that would have kept the remainder in force.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.