Skip to main content
· 10/28/1997

Office of Thrift Supervision v. Paul

Citations

  • 985 F. Supp. 1465
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20421
  • 1997 WL 736488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[S]ummary judgment is appropriate where the defendant fails to come forward with evidence sufficient to dispute an element of the plaintiff’s case or to support an affirmative defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ungaro-Benages

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.