· 12/4/1979
Office of State's Attorney Ex Rel. Sheehan v. Diamond
Citations
- 409 A.2d 599
- 138 Vt. 10
- 1979 Vt. LEXIS 1096
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining Office of State’s Attorney being mentioned in Constitution does not imbue State’s Attorney with any powers other than those granted by statute
- construing § 361(a) and stating that “[t]he Office of the State’s Attorney, as with the local prosecutorial authority in most states, is granted broad discretion in deciding whether or not to initiate a criminal 2 prosecution”
- 3 V.S.A. § 153 gives the two offices at least “equal authority to initiate criminal prosecutions”
- state’s attorney has “broad discretion in deciding whether or not to initiate a criminal prosecution”
- prosecution “granted broad discretion in deciding whether or not to initiate a criminal prosecution”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, Dáley, Larrow, Billings, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.