Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Roger G. Merry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the exclusion of evidence that the victim mistreated his sons was a judgment call that did not result in an objectively unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court
• “The [Supreme] Court has long held that an accused’s right to establish a defense is a fundamental element of due process.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• en might have been sufficiently probative, but the simple fact banc

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).