Skip to main content
· 5/10/2016

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Edward W. Matchett

Citations

  • 368 Wis. 2d 135
  • 2016 WI 33
  • 878 N.W.2d 419
  • 2016 Wisc. LEXIS 140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “Commerce’s discretion in setting time limits to comment on draft results of redetermination is broad, as there is no statute or regulation governing its conduct in this situation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.