· 8/10/1989
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Rapp
Citations
- 777 P.2d 710
- 70 Haw. 539
- 1989 Haw. LEXIS 48
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring clear and convincing evidence of intentional violations, neglect, and an effort to mislead Disciplinary Counsel
- requiring clear and convincing evidence of intentional violations, neglect, and an effort to mislead Disciplinary Counsel
- utilizing a clear and convincing standard of proof in attorney discipline proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.