Skip to main content
· 3/12/2003

Office of Child Support Enforcement v. King

Citations

  • 100 S.W.3d 95
  • 81 Ark. App. 190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial judge’s conclusion of law regarding the application of res judicata is given no deference on appeal
  • treating review of a trial judge’s conclusion that a suit was barred by the application of res judicata as a question of law
  • laches or equitable estoppel is a defense to the enforcement of child-support judgments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sam Bird

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.