· 3/12/2003
Office of Child Support Enforcement v. King
Citations
- 100 S.W.3d 95
- 81 Ark. App. 190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a trial judge’s conclusion of law regarding the application of res judicata is given no deference on appeal
- treating review of a trial judge’s conclusion that a suit was barred by the application of res judicata as a question of law
- laches or equitable estoppel is a defense to the enforcement of child-support judgments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sam Bird
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.