Ofarrit-Figueroa v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that a plaintiff “cannot maintain an independent cause of action for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing under Pennsylvania law”
• concluding that “Rule 12(b)(1) must not be expanded beyond its proper purpose,” and that Bell applies “in only narrow categories of cases”
• concluding that “Rule 12(b)(1) must not be expanded beyond its proper purpose,” and that Bell applies “in only narrow categories of cases”
• concluding that “Rule 12(b)(1) must not be expanded beyond its proper purpose,” and that Bell applies “in only narrow categories of cases”
• noting that with a factual challenge, “[n]o presumptive truthfulness attaches to [the] plaintiff’s allegations … .” (internal quotation marks omitted) (second alteration in original)
• noting that with a factual challenge, “[n]o presumptive truthfulness attaches to [the] plaintiffs allegations.... ” (internal quotation marks omitted) (second alteration in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).