Oeltjenbrun v. CSA Investors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[the][p]urpose of the [confidential relationship] doctrine is to defeat and protect betrayals of trust and abuses of confidence”
• holding as a matter of law that contracts nearly identical to those at issue in this ease were cash forward contracts falling within the statutory exemption
• court must analyze separately HTA contracts with differing terms
• court must analyze separately HTA contracts with differing terms
• treating these facts as indicia of a fiduciary relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).