Oei v. Citibank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a company’s interest in “accommodating” an individual strengthened the individual’s bargaining power
• finding further that “[t]his standard applies to the issuer-beneficiary relationship [as is the case here], at least under New York law”
• reasoning third party’s fraud did not break chain of causation because it was “one of the evils [defendant] was supposed to guard against” and “the harm was foreseeable”
• finding “little disparity in bargaining power” between a national bank and a customer
• evidence that party opposing waiver sought credit from another bank was evidence of bargaining power

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).