O'Donoghue v. S. A. M. Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding summary E-Filed by: Elizabeth Schecter judgment was properly entered on claims for which plaintiff failed to cite any legal authority
• finding no waiver when appellant discussed his four appellate issues in seven parts of his brief instead of four parts and the court's review of the four issues was not substantially impeded
• noting “conspiracy claim will not lie without a valid underlying civil claim” (citations omitted)
• declining to find waiver where appellant raised four issues in his statement of questions involved but argued seven issues in his argument section because “nothing substantially impedes our ability to review” the arguments
• “Civil conspiracy is not an independent cause of action; it must be predicated on an underlying wrong.”
• “A term sheet is not a contract. It is a non7binding summary of terms subject to further refinement and due diligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).