Ninth Circuit· 10/22/1936
O'Donnell v. United States
Citations
- 91 F.2d 14
- 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3382
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that claims precluded by res judicata include those that existed at the time of the first suit and might have been offered in the same cause of action
- “All the authorities are agreed that the provisions of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ... are not self-executing.”
- “All the authorities are agreed that the provisions of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo . . . are not self-executing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Denman, Haney, Iianey, Mathews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandS.D. California· 1955-05-03· cited 19×
- Churchill County v. State EngineerNevada Supreme Court· 2012-05-31· cited 13×
- United States v. FornessW.D. New York· 1941-02-14· cited 8×
- Charles H. Demarest, Inc. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1959-05-20· cited 7×
- Mawhirt v. AhmedE.D. New York· 2000-02-14· cited 3×
- United States v. StewartN.D. California· 1939-08-24· cited 1×
- Warden v. PHH Mortgage Corp.N.D. West Virginia· 2011-07-01
Cites
64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1911-02-20· cited 763×
- Steel v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court· 1882-12-18· cited 256×
- Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court· 1888-12-17· cited 189×
- Lord v. VeazieSupreme Court· 1850-02-22· cited 185×
- United States v. MinnesotaSupreme Court· 1926-03-01· cited 164×
- Wright v. RoseberrySupreme Court· 1887-05-02· cited 151×
- Newhall v. SangerSupreme Court· 1876-05-18· cited 141×
- French v. FyanSupreme Court· 1876-10-30· cited 130×
- Dowell v. ApplegateSupreme Court· 1894-03-05· cited 127×
- Glenny v. LangdonSupreme Court· 1878-10-28· cited 115×
- Davis's Administrator v. WeibboldSupreme Court· 1891-04-06· cited 112×
- National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1930-04-14· cited 112×
- Litchfield v. Goodnow's AdministratorSupreme Court· 1887-12-05· cited 107×
- Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. RustSupreme Court· 1897-12-18· cited 104×
- Wolsey v. ChapmanSupreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 98×
- South Spring Hill Gold Mining Co. v. Amador Medean Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1892-05-16· cited 95×
- Brown v. HitchcockSupreme Court· 1899-04-03· cited 85×
- United States v. StinsonSupreme Court· 1905-03-13· cited 82×
- President of the Bank of the United States v. MossSupreme Court· 1847-12-21· cited 79×
- Orchard v. AlexanderSupreme Court· 1895-04-01· cited 76×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.