Skip to main content

O'DONNELL v. Johnson

Citations

  • 209 P.3d 128
  • 2009 Alas. LEXIS 65
  • 2009 WL 1564167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the common fund doctrine, which allows a litigant or lawyer who recovers a common fund to seek reasonable attorney's fees from the entire fund, does not apply when an insurer actively requests that a plaintiff refrain from pursuing a subrogated claim
  • explaining that the made-whole doctrine addresses circumstance in which subrogation lien would result in insured being less than fully compensated
  • explaining insurer may direct insured not to pursue subrogation claim (citing Ruggles ex rel. Estate of Mayer v. Grow, 984 P.2d 509, 512 (Alaska 1999))
  • discussing doctrine in context of insurer collecting lien from patient’s recovery fund
  • requiring “well-defined benefits” to third party for creation of common fund
  • deciding whether insured created common fund

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carpeneti, Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Carpenetl, Winfree

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named O'DONNELL v. Johnson

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.