Odom v. Frank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting defendant to testify at trial, where his invocation of the 51 privilege at his deposition was not “strategic,” and where the FTC had not “been unfairly prejudiced” by the inability to obtain discovery from the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Odom v. Frank
  Fifth Circuit· 1993-09-23· cited 142×
• Migis v. Pearle Vision, Inc.
  N.D. Texas· 1996-10-28· cited 10×
• Attorney Grievance v. Malone
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-01-31· cited 5×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rush Pettway, Etc. v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor
  Fifth Circuit· 1974-05-22· cited 503×
• Kay v. Ehrler
  Supreme Court· 1991-04-16· cited 485×
• Thompson v. Covington Housing Development Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 220×
• Green v. USX Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1988-03-29· cited 42×
• Consolidated City of Jacksonville v. Nash
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 31×
• Valdez v. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc.
  W.D. Texas· 1988-03-30· cited 24×
• Green v. USX Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1990-02-23· cited 13×
• USX Corp. v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 13×
• Dowdell v. City of Apopka, Fla.
  M.D. Florida· 1981-08-27· cited 12×