Odolecki v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that owner's son did not vitiate initial permission by allowing friend to use vehicle to pick up his girl friend
• holding that owner’s son did not vitiate initial permission by allowing friend to use vehicle to pick up his girl friend
• holding that initial permission was not vitiated where owner permitted only her son to use automobile, and son deviated from that purpose by allowing friend to use vehicle to pick up his girl friend
• holding that initial permission was not vitiated where owner permitted only her son to use automobile, and son deviated from that purpose by allowing friend to use vehicle to pick up his girl friend
• holding that once initial permission is given, person operating vehicle with consent of initial permittee is covered despite owner’s instruction to initial permittee not to let anyone else use vehicle
• stating that, in the context of automobile insurance, “a liability insurance contract is for the benefit of the public as well as for the benefit of the named or additional insured.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).