Odle v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in its case, “editorializing on the facts could be considered as urging consecutive over concurrent sentences” in violation of the plea agreement
• “editorializing” on facts may be improper when State agrees to take no position on portion of sentence
• “A less than truthful soft pedaling or whitewashing of tire extent of defendant’s participation in stating the facts to the court would have been inappropriate.”
• “In speaking to the court, the State had the right to and did state the extent of defendant’s participation in the crimes. A less than truthful soft pedaling or whitewashing of the extent of defendant’s participation in stating the facts to die court would have been inappropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).