Skip to main content
· 3/15/1988

Odis Solomon v. Royal Oak Township, a Municipal Corporation, and Tommy Staton, Defendants- and Marie Turner

Citations

  • 842 F.2d 862
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3281
  • 1988 WL 20899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “This Court has held that speech disclosing public corruption is a matter of public interest and therefore deserves constitutional protection.”
  • “Although [plaintiff police officer’s] statements directly questioned his superior’s work performance, no evidence was presented that this form of disloyalty adversely affected the proper functioning of the department.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Krupansky, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.