Skip to main content
· 4/21/1989

Oden v. Salch

Citations

  • 379 S.E.2d 346
  • 237 Va. 525
  • 5 Va. Law Rep. 2248
  • 1989 Va. LEXIS 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defense counsel did not object “with reasonable certainty” where he had “stated that he objected to [an] instruction because he did not ‘believe that it’s an accurate statement of law, nor that it’s a proper instruction to give based on the facts of this case’”
  • affirming damage award for estate against decedent’s attorney-in-fact for fraudulent conversion of decedent’s assets and holding as proper an instruction that attorney-in-fact owed fidu ciary duties to principal
  • course of self-dealing by holder of general power of attorney held presumptively fraudulent
  • course of self-dealing by holder of general power of attorney held presumptively fraudulent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.