O'DELL v. Municipality of Anchorage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defense counsel’s non-opposition to a continuance “was tantamount to consent” that tolled the defendant’s speedy trial time
• finding a waiver of Rule 45 where a defendant’s non-opposition to a motion for continuance filed by the state led the state and the trial court to rely on the belief that the defendant consented to a trial date beyond the 120-day speedy trial limit
• finding a waiver of Rule 45 where a defendant's non-opposition to a motion for continuance filed by the state led the state and the trial court to rely on the belief that the defendant consented to a trial date beyond the 120-day speedy trial limit
• consent in the form of written nonopposition filed pretrial
• consent in the form of written nonopposition filed pretrial
• discussing events that begin operation of the rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).