Odekirk v. Austin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding evidence sufficient to sustain a 22 negligence finding where the jury could have believed that the defendant did not see the 23 plaintiff until an instant before his car struck the plaintiff but that he should have seen the 24 plaintiff sooner
• applying Restatement (1st) of Torts, Secs. 479 — 480

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).