Odeco Oil and Gas Company, Drilling Division and Odeco Drilling Services, Inc. v. David J. Bonnette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claimants’ stipulations, which fully protected the shipowner’s right to seek limited liability, and claimants’ agreement to abide by an admiralty court determination of the right to limit were adequate to lift an injunction of state court proceedings
• vacating and remanding stay of limitation proceeding so that the district court could consider implications of codefendant’s potential cross claim for contribution or indemnification
• vacating stay to allow the district court to examine possible claims for contribution and indemnity because those claims “if preserved and matured, could cause a multiple claimant-inadequate fund situation to arise”
• vacating stay to allow the district court to examine possible claims for contribution and indemnity because those claims “if preserved and matured, could cause a multiple claimant-inadequate fund situation to arise”
• doctors have discretion to deny a request to see a specialist when circumstances do not require it
• doctors have discretion to deny a request to see a specialist when circumstances do not require it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).