ODC, Pet v. John William Eddy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the Copyright Act must be construed in light of its basic purpose \[w]hen technological change has rendered its literal terms ambiguous\
• noting that the \limited copyright duration required by the Constitution\ serves to encourage authors while eventually bringing their works within the public domain
• noting that the “limited copyright duration required by the Constitution” serves to encourage authors while eventually bringing their works within the public domain
• noting that the \limited copyright duration required by the Constitution\ serves to encourage authors while eventually bringing their works within the public domain
• stating that the basic purpose of the Copyright Act is “to stimulate artistic creativity for the general public good”
• explaining that the “ultimate aim” of copyright law is to “stimulate artistic creativity for the general public good”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).