E.D. Pennsylvania· 12/30/1946
O'Daniel v. Pennsylvania R.
Citations
- 72 F. Supp. 15
- 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1738
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing claim splitting as “a sub-species of the doctrine 18 of claim preclusion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirkpatrick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pennsylvania R. v. PetersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1887-05-02· cited 20×
- Quinn v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-03-22· cited 20×
- Pennsylvania R. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1889-11-11· cited 18×
- Johnson v. West Chester & Philadelphia RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1872-01-29· cited 16×
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1858-07-01· cited 11×
- Hunterson v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1903-05-04· cited 7×
- Bacon v. Delaware etc. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1891-05-27· cited 5×
- Walters v. Phila. Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1894-04-02· cited 5×
- Purvis v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-11-14· cited 1×
- Bradney v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-05-23· cited 1×
Other cases named O'Daniel v. Pennsylvania R.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.