Skip to main content
· 12/31/1980

Odam v. Arthur Murray, Inc.

Citations

  • 621 P.2d 453
  • 5 Kan. App. 2d 612
  • 1980 Kan. App. LEXIS 339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • franchisor-franchise relationship insufficient to support personal jurisdiction under a nearly identical long-arm statute where “there is nothing in [the] record to indicate that [the franchisor] engaged in any of the activities or transactions” in the complaint
  • defendant personally solicited plaintiff and engaged in regular business efforts to attract other Kansas residents as customers; defendant had a history of carrying on business with Kansas residents, with foreseeable consequences by doing so in the greater Kansas City metropolitan area

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foth, Abbott, Spencer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.