O'CONNOR v. City of Waterbury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]f a contract is unambiguous within its four comers, intent of the parties is a question of law requiring plenary review” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• “[i]f a contract is unambiguous within its four comers, intent of the parties is a question of law requiring plenary review” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• where contract clear and unambiguous within its four comers, intent of parties is question of law requiring plenary review and contract to be given effect according to terms
• “A contract is ambiguous if the intent of the parties is not clear and certain from the language of the contract itself . . . . When the language of a contract is ambiguous, the determination of the parties’ intent is a question of fact.”
• interpreting collective bargaining agreement under contract law principles
• administrative appeal from decision of Waterbury’s retirement board

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).