Skip to main content
· 7/31/2007

O'CONNOR v. Burningham

Citations

  • 2007 UT 58
  • 165 P.3d 1214
  • 583 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
  • 2007 Utah LEXIS 139
  • 2007 WL 2212679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “little justification” to treat relationships in the familial setting different that those in a comparable “business world”
  • addressing the “conditional privilege for family relationships,” the “conditional protection for communications that contain information relating to intra-family relationships,” and the “intra-family relationship privilege” under Section 597
  • recognizing an employer-employee communications privilege to defamation
  • “Public officials owe their status to the duties demanded by their official positions, not to the vagaries of events that may occur while they occupy these positions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nehring, Durham, Wilkins, Durrant, Parrish, Nehring'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.