C.D. Illinois· 9/26/1990
O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
Citations
- 748 F. Supp. 672
- 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12996
- 1990 WL 143647
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that federal permissible dose limits set the standard of care under Illinois law
- certifying that question for interlocutory appeal
- certifying that question for interlocutory appeal
- “This Court further finds that the question of whether or not the [federal permissible dose] regulation in this case should be adopted as the standard of care applicable to this case is an issue which should be certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mihm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- James R. O'COnner v. Commonwealth Edison Company and London Nuclear Services, Inc., and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1994-01-07· cited 244×
- Brannon v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Third Circuit· 1991-07-26· cited 130×
- In Re Tmi. General Public Utilities Corp. Metropolitan Edison Company Jersey Central Power & Light Co. Pennsylvania Electric Co. Babcock & Wilcox Company McDermott Incorporated Ue & C Catalytic, Inc. (Raytheon) Burns & Roe Enterprises Dresser IndustriesThird Circuit· 1995-10-17· cited 93×
- Day v. NLOS.D. Ohio· 1994-03-22· cited 43×
- Whiting v. Boston Edison Co.D. Massachusetts· 1995-02-17· cited 40×
- O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.C.D. Illinois· 1992-07-23· cited 30×
- Lamb v. Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.W.D. Kentucky· 1993-07-27· cited 23×
- Isaacs v. Caterpillar, Inc.C.D. Illinois· 1991-05-23· cited 23×
- Bohrmann v. Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co.D. Maine· 1996-05-01· cited 17×
- Mueller v. First Nat. Bank of the Quad CitiesC.D. Illinois· 1992-02-12· cited 15×
- Landry v. Florida Power & Light Corp.S.D. Florida· 1992-08-05· cited 11×
- Coley v. Commonwealth Edison Co.N.D. Illinois· 1991-05-10· cited 9×
- Cooper v. Southern California Edison Co.Ninth Circuit· 2006-03-13· cited 9×
- Sikkelee ex rel. Estate Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corp.M.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-09-10· cited 8×
- Abdullah v. American Airlines, Inc.Virgin Islands· 1997-06-05· cited 6×
- O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.C.D. Illinois· 1991-07-10· cited 4×
- Radiation Sterilizers, Inc. v. United StatesE.D. Washington· 1994-10-31· cited 3×
- Lokos v. Detroit EdisonE.D. Michigan· 1999-09-01· cited 3×
- Lawson v. General Electric Co.N.D. California· 2015-09-23· cited 3×
- Finestone v. Florida Power & Light Co.S.D. Florida· 2004-05-19· cited 1×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court· 1965-09-29· cited 487×
- Davis v. Marathon Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-10-01· cited 154×
- Barnes v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court· 1973-11-30· cited 149×
- Dezort v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-02-06· cited 74×
- Von Bulow by Auersperg v. Von BulowS.D. New York· 1986-07-01· cited 60×
- Mangan v. F. C. Pilgrim & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-09-24· cited 40×
- Boyer v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1967-09-29· cited 36×
- Laswell v. BrownEighth Circuit· 1982-07-21· cited 34×
- Johnston v. United StatesD. Kansas· 1984-11-15· cited 32×
- Pyne v. WitmerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-08-06· cited 32×
- Virgil Homer and Helen Homer v. Pabst Brewing CompanySeventh Circuit· 1986-12-12· cited 27×
- In re A.H. Robins Co.D. Kansas· 1985-05-29· cited 26×
- Batteast v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-06-22· cited 23×
- Avery v. Moews Seed Corn Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1971-03-30· cited 21×
- Laufenberg v. GolabAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-07-19· cited 18×
- Bubash v. Philadelphia Electric Co.M.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-08-17· cited 16×
- Hunt v. BlasiusAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-12-12· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.