Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 9/24/1991
O'Connell v. O'Connell
Citations
- 597 A.2d 643
- 409 Pa. Super. 25
- 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2990
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing award of counsel fees; husband’s vigorous -6- J-A02020-17 defense of his position in a “bitterly contested” support matter did not establish “the stringent requirement that [husband’s] behavior was dilatory, obdurate or vexatious” or done in bad faith
- trial court award of attorneys' fees affirmed where lower court found the appellants' conduct dilatory, obdurate, and vexatious
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Montemuro, Tamilia, Brosky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cook, R. v. Cook, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-05-04· cited 48×
- Kelly v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-19· cited 21×
- Bonds v. BondsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-01-30· cited 16×
- Reif v. ReifSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-01· cited 11×
- Bowser v. BlomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-01-03· cited 10×
- delCastillo v. delCastilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-12-02· cited 7×
- Hecker v. O'CONNELLSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-08-23· cited 5×
- Malenfant v. MalenfantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-11· cited 3×
- Barinka v. BarinkaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-05
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.