Skip to main content
· 8/4/1995

O'CONNELL v. Killington, Ltd.

Citations

  • 665 A.2d 39
  • 164 Vt. 73
  • 1995 Vt. LEXIS 74

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating other factors to consider in determining if legal duty exists, including “the closeness of the connection between defendant’s conduct and plaintiff’s injury”
  • manual establishing procedures for ski accidents did not demonstrate assumption of duty to third parties
  • common-law negligence requires legal duty owed by defendant to plaintiff, breach of duty, breach was proximate cause of plaintiff's harm, and plaintiff suffered actual harm
  • ski area has no duty to protect the litigation interest of a skier injured in a collision on the slopes
  • negligence law does not recognize a duty absent physical harm
  • loss of right to sue for compensation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.