· 8/4/1995
O'CONNELL v. Killington, Ltd.
Citations
- 665 A.2d 39
- 164 Vt. 73
- 1995 Vt. LEXIS 74
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating other factors to consider in determining if legal duty exists, including “the closeness of the connection between defendant’s conduct and plaintiff’s injury”
- manual establishing procedures for ski accidents did not demonstrate assumption of duty to third parties
- common-law negligence requires legal duty owed by defendant to plaintiff, breach of duty, breach was proximate cause of plaintiff's harm, and plaintiff suffered actual harm
- ski area has no duty to protect the litigation interest of a skier injured in a collision on the slopes
- negligence law does not recognize a duty absent physical harm
- loss of right to sue for compensation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.