Ockman v. T. L. James & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that maternal grandmother had standing to pursue custody but had to establish substantive claims
• explaining that the “PKPA requires that states give full faith and credit to another jurisdiction’s child custody determination made in compliance with the provisions of the PKPA” (citation omitted)
• noting that purpose a Children’s Fast Track designation is to “expedite the disposition” of such cases as they have “profound effects on the lives of children as they await permanency”
• declining to apply revised statute in proceedings that concluded several months prior to the revisions taking legal effect
• declining to apply revised version of statute in custody proceedings that concluded several months prior to the revisions taking legal effect
• declining to apply revised version of statute in custody proceedings that concluded prior to the revisions taking legal effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).