Skip to main content
· 9/28/1915

Ockerman v. Woodward

Citations

  • 165 Ky. 752
  • 178 S.W. 1100
  • 1915 Ky. LEXIS 615

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing Rehabilitation Act and ADA claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the IDEA
  • observing distinction between claims that “challenge the implementation of an IEP” as opposed to “substantive claims for failure to provide a FAPE”
  • dismissing ADA, Rehabilitation Act, and NJLAD claims for failure to exhaust IDEA administrative remedies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.