Ochs v. Makousky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it was a question of fact for jury whether defendant removed without permission $50,000 from joint account of elderly woman for whom he provided care-taking services

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Doe v. Zedek
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1999-01-15· cited 185×
• State v. Jordan B. (In Re Interest of Jordan B.)
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2018-06-22· cited 106×
• Boettcher v. Balka
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1997-05-23· cited 54×
• Klinginsmith v. Wichmann
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1997-08-01· cited 50×
• Zimmerman v. FirsTier Bank, N.A.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1998-10-23· cited 44×
• Evergreen Farms v. First National Bank & Trust Co.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-10-04· cited 41×
• Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic Marking
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1996-11-22· cited 33×
• Blose v. MacTier
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 16×
• In re Interest of Jordan B.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2018-06-22· cited 6×
• Helmstadter v. North American Biological, Inc.
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1997-02-11· cited 5×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Healy v. Langdon
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1994-01-28· cited 115×
• Barelmann v. Fox
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1992-01-10· cited 55×
• Winfield v. CIGNA COMPANIES
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1995-05-19· cited 43×
• ConAgra, Inc. v. Bartlett Partnership
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1995-12-08· cited 15×
• Melcher v. Bank of Madison
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1995-11-17· cited 12×
• Schmidt v. Schmidt
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1988-06-10· cited 8×