Skip to main content
· 10/11/1995

Ochs v. Albin

Citations

  • 903 P.2d 906
  • 137 Or. App. 213
  • 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he fact that the parties contemplate a future writing does not by itself prohibit specific performance.”
  • essential terms include terms required by law and those \unique to a particular agreement\
  • essential terms include terms required by law and those “unique to a particular agreement”
  • “If all of the material terms that are to be incorpo- rated into a future writing have been agreed on, the initial agreement is specifically enforceable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Edmonds, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.