· 10/11/1995
Ochs v. Albin
Citations
- 903 P.2d 906
- 137 Or. App. 213
- 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he fact that the parties contemplate a future writing does not by itself prohibit specific performance.”
- essential terms include terms required by law and those \unique to a particular agreement\
- essential terms include terms required by law and those “unique to a particular agreement”
- “If all of the material terms that are to be incorpo- rated into a future writing have been agreed on, the initial agreement is specifically enforceable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warren, Edmonds, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.