Skip to main content
· 5/18/1988

Ocello v. United States

Citations

  • 685 F. Supp. 100
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4501
  • 1988 WL 48612

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding of a price-fixing combination in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act would destroy privilege to interfere with business and would constitute a common law tort under Pennsylvania law
  • “a manufacturer may sell its product to whomever it wishes, and a unilateral refusal to deal has not been considered to be a violation of the Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sarokin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.