Oceanic Companies, Inc. v. Kukui'ula Development Co. LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[t]he juxtaposition of mandatory and permissive language in such proximity and usage [in the arbitration clause] demonstrates an intentional distinction between what is required and what is not required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).