Oceana, Inc. v. Gary Locke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the 30-day deadline in § 1855(f) for seeking judicial review impl[ies] a congressional preference for immediate resolution.”
• reading statutory provision as mandatory where, in contrast to a neighboring provision, duty imposed was not modified by phrase “to the extent practicable”
• reading statutory provision as mandatory where, in contrast to a neighboring provision, duty imposed was not modified by phrase “to the extent practicable”
• comparing two sections, one of which contained “to the extent practicable” qualifier and noting that for the other subsection, “[w]hen a statute commands an agency without qualification to carry out a particular program in a particular way, the agency’s duty is clear”
• “Defendants do not need to produce a privilege log describing documents withheld from the administrative record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).