OCASIO, ORLANDO O., PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging this court's authority to overturn precedent where rule of law erroneous or no longer sound
• refusing to disturb this court's order denying motion for attorney fees under Supreme Court Rule 7.07[c]
• regardless of whether statutory language is ambiguous, doctrine of stare decisis is compelling reason to affirm lower courts' decision based on precedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).