Ocana v. American Furniture Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the movant must establish that 13 it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law
• finding that sexually harassing a subordinate employee was not within a supervisor’s scope of employment
• concluding a plaintiff could pursue tolling where a factual question existed as to the mailing of a determination letter from the State of New Mexico Human Rights Bureau
• “Equitable tolling typically applies in cases where a litigant was prevented from filing suit because of an extraordinary event beyond his or her control.”
• “Equitable tolling typically applies in cases where a litigant was prevented from filing suit because of an extraordinary event beyond his or her eontrol.”
• “When interpreting the NMHRA our Supreme Court has looked to federal decisions for guidance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).