Ocala Kennel Club, Inc. v. Rosenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that it was appropriate to treble the monetary award to compensate plaintiff and provide deterrence
• finding that a plaintiff suffered an 1 injury and had standing as a competitor to bring a Lanham Act claim because “[the parties] 2 both produce competing sources of folate for use in dietary supplements”
• finding standing when both parties produce competing sources of ingredients for use in dietary supplements
• granting enhanced damages because proven damages would not fully compensate plaintiff, but not as high as the number requested because requested award would be excessive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).