O'BRYAN v. Hedgespeth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute mandating admissibility of collateral source payment information in tort actions contravened the rules of evidence and impermissibly encroached on the rule-making authority of this Court
• holding that statute mandating admissibility of collateral source payment information in tort actions contravened the rules of evidence and impermissibly encroached on the rulemaking authority of this Court
• holding that motion in limine preserved error for appeal and that the objecting party did not waive the allegation of error when it subsequently introduced the evidence to which it had objected
• holding that motion in limine preserved error for appeal and that the objecting party did not waive the allegation of error when it subsequently introduced the evidence to which it had objected
• \Kentucky Constitution Section 116 vests exclusive jurisdiction in the Supreme Court to prescribe `rules of practice and procedure for the Court of Justice.'\
• statute allowing collateral source payments into evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).