Skip to main content
· 9/21/2006

O'BRYAN v. Cave

Citations

  • 202 S.W.3d 585
  • 2006 Ky. LEXIS 234
  • 2006 WL 2706959

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[S]peculation and supposition are insufficient to justify a submission of a case to the jury, and . . . the question should be taken from the jury when the evidence is so unsatisfactory as to require a resort to surmise and speculation.”
  • explaining speculation is insufficient to overcome summary judgment
  • explaining speculation is not evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Opinion of the Court by Justice Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.