Skip to main content
· 9/16/1908

O'Bryan v. American Investment & Improvement Co.

Citations

  • 50 Wash. 371
  • 97 P. 241
  • 1908 Wash. LEXIS 739

Syllabus

<p>Judgments — Entry—Modification. Where it is conceded that it was the intention of the trial judge to dismiss an action without prejudice, it is error to refuse to modify a judgment which is doubtful in that respect so that its meaning will be clear.</p> <p>Same — Procedure—Power of Court. Since the court has inherent power to modify a judgment entry to make it conform to the judgment actually entered, independent of any statute, it is not material under what statute the party seeks relief.</p> <p>■ Same — Discretion — Appeal — Review. The modification of a judgment entry to make it conform to the judgment actually entered is not a matter of discretion, but an imperative duty, the denial of which may be reviewed on appeal.</p>

Judges: Fullerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.