Skip to main content
· 3/16/1990

O'BRIEN v. Williamson Daily News

Citations

  • 735 F. Supp. 218
  • 18 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1037
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11395
  • 1990 WL 41158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing defamation claims of teachers not identified in an article that mentioned “teachers having affairs with students” because the article referred to “no identifiable group member and does not impugn the reputation of any specific member”
  • dismissing defamation claims of teachers not identified in an article that mentioned “teachers having affairs with students” because the article referred to “no identifiable group member and does not impugn the reputation of any specific member”
  • dismissing defamation claims of teachers not identified in an article that mentioned “teachers having affairs with students” because the article referred to “no identifiable group member and does not impugn the reputation of any specific member”
  • group of 27 teachers too large to bring libel claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.