O'BRIEN v. Stanzel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We do not hold that there are no situations in which a trial court may exercise discretion even though the trial has progressed beyond the rule’s point of no return.”
• “[W]hen a plaintiff takes a non-suit after he has presented his evidence and has rested his own case-in-chief, the order of dismissal entered thereon shall be one of dismissal with prejudice to refile.”
• “[W]hen a plaintiff takes a non-suit after he has presented his evidence and has rested his own case-in-chief, the order of dismissal entered thereon shall be one of dismissal with prejudice to refile.”
• “We do not hold that there are no situations in which a trial court may exercise discretion even though the trial has progressed beyond the rule’s point of no return . . . .”
• “We do not hold that there are no situations in which a trial court may exercise discretion even though the trial has progressed beyond the rule’s point of no return . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).